5 Letter Words That End With Ne Merriam Webster

Please wait for another 5 minutes Or Please wait another 5 minutes Isn't "for" mandatory because 5 minutes is length of time? Please wait for another 5 minutes Or Please wait another 5 minutes Isn't "for" mandatory because 5 minutes is length of time? - 1It's syntactically valid to include preposition for in the imperative "Wait [for] a minute", said John. But as this usage chart shows, native speakers almost never do so.

Offhand I can't think of a single context where you must include for between wait and a "length of waiting time" complement, so my advice is to just forget about it. If you never include for, it'll never be wrong, and will usually be more idiomaticFumbleFingers– FumbleFingers2024-05-09 14:25:59 +00:00Commented May 9, 2024 at 14:25 Add a comment | Isn't for mandatory because 5 minutes is length of time? No.

In "Please wait another 5 minutes", "another 5 minutes" is a noun phrase acting as an adverb (or to be more precise, as an adverbial prepositional phrase) to modify verbs and certain adjectives. They produce a complement. These constructions are known as adverbial objectives and they are common with time and distance phrases.

The Free Dictionary has examples: Time “I am leaving tomorrow.” (originally = on the morrow = in the morning) “We walked [for] an hour out of town.” “I’ll see you [in [the]] next year.” Distance “I run [for] five miles every day.” “I can barely see [for] a foot in front of me in this fog.” - Sometimes for sounds more idiomatic, sometimes they're equally idiomatic, but I haven't thought about it much. For example: Can you hold your breath for three minutes?

sounds much better to my ear than Can you hold your breath three minutes? whereas Can you wait three minutes? and Can you wait for three minutes? sound equally idiomatic.TimR-gone from here– TimR-gone from here2024-05-09 13:59:12 +00:00Commented May 9, 2024 at 13:59 - @TimR: It's a somewhat different context with hold your breath than with wait.

I certainly don't think it's so easy to come up with contexts where including for after wait is "more idiomatic" than not including it, but I stand to be corrected on that point.FumbleFingers– FumbleFingers2024-05-09 14:29:15 +00:00Commented May 9, 2024 at 14:29 - @FumbleFingers That's the point. What exactly is this "different context"? Is it that with hold your breath there is already an object, your breath? But then Can you run in place 90 seconds?

sounds odd to me too and there's no object there.TimR-gone from here– TimR-gone from here2024-05-09 14:41:25 +00:00Commented May 9, 2024 at 14:41 - @TimR: Well, it might be relevant that hold your breath already has "prepositionless modifier" your breath attached to the verb hold. With prepositionless modifier quietly I have no particular preference for including for or not in something like I'll just sit quietly [for] a minute, but I'd be very unlikely to include it in Don't rush me! Just hold on [for] a minute.

I dunno - maybe there is no real pattern to our preferences here.FumbleFingers– FumbleFingers2024-05-09 15:13:55 +00:00Commented May 9, 2024 at 15:13 - @FumbleFingers Could be, could be. As I said above, I haven't thought about it much, but sometimes there is indeed a strong preference for for, and sometimes none at all; it could go either way.TimR-gone from here– TimR-gone from here2024-05-09 15:14:51 +00:00Commented May 9, 2024 at 15:14

People Also Asked

• word choice - How to say that you are available - English...
• past tense - He {went / has gone / had gone} out 5 minutes ago...
• meaning - So, "in 5 minutes" means either "during 5 minutes" or...
• 百度知道 - 全球领先中文互动问答平台
• prepositions - "Please wait for another 5 minutes" or "Please...
• 万分之五怎么写?0.5% 0.5‰ 5‰ ?到底是那个啊?谢谢_百度知道
• 万分之五怎么写？0.5% 0.5‰ 5‰ ？到底是那个啊？谢谢
• 数字5代表什么意思？ - 百度知道